Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 16.02GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 920A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 +4359%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce 920A
0.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1001 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.02GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
32
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
33W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
GK208B
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GM
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net