NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX130 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1680MHz vs 1189MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+3480%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce MX130
0.913 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Nov 2017
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1109 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1189 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.512 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.54 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
913.2 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.54 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16S-GTR-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
379 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
