NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1680MHz vs 1594MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+2570%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2020
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
3
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1
(N17S-G3-A1)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
