NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1680MHz vs 1455MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+15%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q
28.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
76
9728
Shading Units
9728
304
TMUs
304
112
ROPs
112
304
Tensor Cores
304
76
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
