NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs ATI Radeon E2400
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
9688 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+68004%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
40
304
TMUs
4
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
RV610
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
