NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs AMD Radeon R7 A360
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1680MHz vs 1125MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
9344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+3683%
32.69 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A360
0.864 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
May 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1100 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
384
304
TMUs
24
112
ROPs
8
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.000 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.00 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
864.0 GFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
864.0 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
54.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Meso
-
GPU Variant
Meso XT
(216-0864018)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
