NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1680MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2
+428%
32.69 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
682 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1207 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
20
9728
Shading Units
2560
304
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
48
304
Tensor Cores
80
76
RT Cores
20
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.94 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.56 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.180 TFLOPS
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.180 TFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
