NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1680MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
9088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5000 Max Q Ada Generation
+2253%
32.69 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 900A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
930 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
576.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
640
304
TMUs
40
112
ROPs
16
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
188.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.36 GPixel/s
510.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.40 GTexel/s
32.69 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
32.69 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1389 GFLOPS
510.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-GX-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
