NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro D700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 6GB VRAM FirePro D700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 263.0GB/s)
16128 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2515%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro D700
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1370 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
263.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
2048
568
TMUs
128
192
ROPs
32
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
274W
700 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Tahiti
AD102
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
