Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
18096 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation +113725%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2010
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro RG
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
80
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
35W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
M93
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy