NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+1040%
91.06 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Ada
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
4096
568
TMUs
256
192
ROPs
64
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Capsaicin
AD102
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.0
