NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
17536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+7388%
91.06 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
1.216 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2022
Release Date
Feb 2014
Quadro Ada
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
915 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
640
568
TMUs
40
192
ROPs
16
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
80W
700 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD102
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
