Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel H3C XG310

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 62% (2505MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
17408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +3724%
91.06 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
768
568
TMUs
48
192
ROPs
24
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

481.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
1423 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
91.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
91.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
1423 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
300W
700 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
DG1
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
5 nm
Process Size
10 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
Unknown
609 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy