Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded +809%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy