NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
2040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+31633%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
-
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
2048
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
60W
TDP
23W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
