Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1627MHz vs 1480MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded +119%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
1076 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
40
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
16 nm
Unknown
Transistors
4.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net