NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 2GB VRAM Quadro P520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1627MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+480%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro P520 Mobile
1.147 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A1000 Embedded
+1652%
1297
Quadro P520 Mobile
74
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
1303 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.89 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.83 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.92 GFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1147 GFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.83 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
18W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GP108
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
