NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1627MHz vs 1215MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
+42%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4.666 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A1000 Embedded
1297
Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
+25%
1623
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
600 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
2048
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
240
16
RT Cores
30
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.76 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
145.8 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.331 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.666 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
TU106
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
10.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
