NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1627MHz vs 1500MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25
+84%
12.29 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
1400 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
12.5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
