NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1700MHz vs 1627MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X
+618%
47.87 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1192 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
220
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
14080
64
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
Unknown
Transistors
58.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
