NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs Intel Arc A770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A770 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (2400MHz vs 1462MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A1000
6.737 TFLOPS
Arc A770
+191%
19.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
727 MHz
Base Clock
2100 MHz
1462 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
18
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
128
72
Tensor Cores
512
18
RT Cores
32
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
307.2 GPixel/s
105.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
614.4 GTexel/s
6.737 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.32 TFLOPS
6.737 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.66 TFLOPS
105.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.458 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
