Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +2945%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.27 billion
Unknown
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy