CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 60W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+18656%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Embedded
VS
Quadro FX 380 LP
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
20
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
60W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
2
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB
3
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
4
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
5
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
6
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
7
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
8
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
9
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
10
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID M60 1Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy