Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +18656%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

60W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy