Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded +661%
8.253 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy