NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs Intel Arc A370M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB and 4GB VRAM Arc A370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1550MHz vs 1177MHz)
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
+89%
6.026 TFLOPS
Arc A370M
3.174 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
607 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.60 GPixel/s
94.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
99.20 GTexel/s
6.026 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.349 TFLOPS
6.026 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.174 TFLOPS
94.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
793.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
