Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs AMD FirePro M4100

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs AMD FirePro M4100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1177MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB +1072%
6.026 TFLOPS
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2013
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.360 GPixel/s
94.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.08 GTexel/s
6.026 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.026 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
514.6 GFLOPS
94.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.16 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net