Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (2115MHz vs 1177MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB
6.026 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +115%
12.99 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

607 MHz
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1177 MHz
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
3072
80
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
96
20
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

56.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
94.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
6.026 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
6.026 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
94.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net