NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M6000
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+503%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.80 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.00 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1024 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
64.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
43W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Heathrow
-
GPU Variant
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
