Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 920MX

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce 920MX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1207MHz vs 993MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (16W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +1116%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce 920MX
0.508 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
965 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
256
80
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.944 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.83 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
508.4 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
15.89 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
16W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GM108
-
GPU Variant
N16V-GMR1-S
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
5.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net