Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +179%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 680MX Mac Edition
2.209 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2012
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.01 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.03 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.209 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.03 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
122W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N13E-GTX2-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net