Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs ATI Mobility FireGL V5725

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Mobility FireGL V5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +3691%
6.18 TFLOPS
Mobility FireGL V5725
0.163 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Ampere-MW
Generation
Mobility FireGL
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.720 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.440 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.2 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
M86
-
GPU Variant
M86-ME XT GL (216-0683010)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.378 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
135 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net