NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (217.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+37%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 575
4.489 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2017
Ampere-MW
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL
(215-0910052)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
