Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB vs Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1650MHz vs 1612MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB +225%
8.253 TFLOPS
Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2020
Ampere-MW
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG1
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.1
Samsung
Foundry
Intel
8 nm
Process Size
10 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net