Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile +848%
6.953 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

893 MHz
Base Clock
-
1358 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.18 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
108.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
6.953 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.953 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
108.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy