Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +2350%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Aug 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
192
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK107
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
N14M-Q1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy