Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K510M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K510M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K510M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +2242%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K510M
0.341 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

26
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
3328
Shading Units
192
104
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
8
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.556 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.22 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
341.4 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.22 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK208
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy