Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1200MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +124%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
-
3328
Shading Units
2304
104
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
48
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
GK110B
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
12 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy