Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1230MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile +1974%
10.08 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2011
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
32
SM Count
8
4096
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net