NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1545MHz vs 1230MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A3000 Mobile
+6%
10.08 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
9.492 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A3000 Mobile
8191
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh
+11%
9149
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2020
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
600 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
32
SM Count
48
4096
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
384
32
RT Cores
48
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
78.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
157.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
10.08 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
10.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
157.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
TU104B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
