NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A4 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4 Mobile
+603%
7.25 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1297 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
56.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
113.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
7.250 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
113.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
