Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2000MHz vs 1762MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (25W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +13%
3.072 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
RTX A400
2091
Arc A350 +54%
3239

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
24
Tensor Cores
96
6
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net