NVIDIA RTX A400 vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+515%
2.706 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Aug 2007
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
