NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+340%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
May 2011
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
