NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A400
+11%
2.706 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1280
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
