Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400 +2606%
2.706 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
1
768
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy