Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

NVIDIA RTX A400 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A400 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A400
2.706 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7950 +5%
2.867 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2024
Release Date
Jan 2012
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1762 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
1792
24
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
24
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.19 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
2.706 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.706 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
42.29 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
200W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy