Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000 +2515%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
51W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
GK107
GA104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net