Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H +2396%
19.17 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Ampere
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
512
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

140W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
Cape Verde
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy