NVIDIA RTX A4000H vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (140W vs 580W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A4000H
+240%
19.17 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2014
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
176
96
ROPs
64
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
149.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
140W
TDP
580W
300 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
Hawaii
GA104-???-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT
(215-0852000)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
