Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A4500 Embedded +17787%
14.31 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

510 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
46
SM Count
4
5888
Shading Units
32
184
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
184
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

116.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
223.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
14.31 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.31 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
223.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA104
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
80 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net